假期还是地狱？封锁期间的情绪调节和抑郁症状记忆。

发布时间：2025-07-01 21:08

定期检查：监控抑郁症状的变化 #生活技巧# #情绪管理技巧# #抑郁情绪调节#

假期还是地狱？封锁期间的情绪调节和抑郁症状记忆。

IF 3.4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行病的持续影响为研究如何记忆痛苦事件提供了无与伦比的背景。先前的理论和研究表明：(a) 与最初的经历相比，封锁期间的痛苦可能会消退并被记忆为不那么痛苦，或者仍然突出并被记忆为更痛苦；(b) 情绪抑制和认知再评价可能会预测这些记忆偏差。我们通过在两次封锁期间评估抑郁症状和情绪调节来验证这些可能性：在大流行开始时（2020 年封锁）和 17 个月后（2021 年封锁），以有年幼子女的父母为样本（N = 272）。我们评估了 2020 年 "禁闭 "期间抑郁症状记忆的追踪准确性、方向偏差和投射偏差，以及编码（2020 年 "禁闭"）和回忆（2021 年 "禁闭"）时情绪调节的调节作用。在大流行后期（2021 年）出现更多抑郁症状的人回忆起大流行开始时（2020 年）出现的抑郁症状比最初出现的要多（投射偏差）。在回忆时（2021 年）情绪压抑程度较高的人不太可能将目前的抑郁症状投射到之前的封锁记忆中（投射偏差较低），他们记忆中的抑郁症状比最初经历的要轻（低估方向偏差）。相比之下，在回忆时进行认知再评价（2021 年）的人所记得的抑郁症状比他们最初经历过的要严重（高估方向偏差）。这些出乎意料的结果表明，在现实生活中，情绪调节对情绪记忆的影响可能不同于实验室研究中观察到的模式，并可能反映出对生活事件的有益应对。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Holiday or hell? Emotion regulation and memory of depressive symptoms during lockdown.

The ongoing repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic provide an unparalleled context to examine how distressing events are remembered. Prior theory and research suggest that (a) distress during lockdowns may fade and be remembered as less distressing, or remain salient and be remembered as more distressing, than initially experienced and (b) emotional suppression and cognitive reappraisal may predict these memory biases. We test these possibilities by assessing depressive symptoms and emotion regulation during two lockdowns: at the start of the pandemic (Lockdown 2020) and 17 months later (Lockdown 2021) in a sample of parents with young children (N = 272). We assessed tracking accuracy, directional bias, and projection bias in memory of depressive symptoms in Lockdown 2020, and the moderating role of emotion regulation at the time of encoding (Lockdown 2020) and recall (Lockdown 2021). People experiencing more depressive symptoms later in the pandemic (2021) remembered the start of the pandemic (2020) to involve more depressive symptoms than initially experienced (projection bias). People engaging in greater emotional suppression at recall (2021) were less likely to project their current depressive symptoms onto memory of the prior lockdown (lower projection bias) and remembered feeling lower depressive symptoms than initially experienced (underestimation directional bias). By contrast, people engaging in cognitive reappraisal at recall (2021) remembered feeling greater depressive symptoms than they initially experienced (overestimation directional bias). These unexpected results indicate that emotion regulation may shape memory of emotion during real-life challenges differently than patterns observed in lab-based research and may reflect helpful coping with life events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

7.10%

发文量

325

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.

假期还是地狱？封锁期间的情绪调节和抑郁症状记忆。

假期还是地狱？封锁期间的情绪调节和抑郁症状记忆。

摘要

相关内容

随便看看

最新动态分享

热点动态分享

专题

推荐动态分享